3 ms·
For one thing, we should be adversarial for the sake of testing the limits and possible risks of the system that aren't necessarily published by the company. It
by beepbooptheory 4y ago
For one thing, we should be adversarial for the sake of testing the limits and possible risks of the system that aren't necessarily published by the company. It veers on an almost moral imperative at this point!
I am in general heartened to see this impulse so universally and so strong, rather than just totally giving up in the face of what is still ultimately a product from a company. Black hat/white hat, it's all pure humanity in the face of something so utterly inhuman. It's beautiful.
- Algemarin 4y agoThat's precisely my question though, what are the possible risks? To me this seems less like a security exercise and more just like a fun way to get the bot the say things it normally wouldn't.
- beepbooptheory 4y agoI don't think we can quite know yet really, but whatever it will be, this will be a solid avenue to at least not be caught by surprise. And just, we are already starting to be like "ok lets start teaching people with this" or "maybe we don't need lawyers or doctors anymore." Maybe we don't see the full implications yet, but there is a lot of potential for undesirable externalities already! That seems reason enough to be constantly trying to break it to find whatever out from this practice. The day we stop hacking and trying to break and/or coerce things is the day we lose everything. Isn't this how we all got into this computer stuff to begin with?