4 ms·
the multi-decade preparatory exercise adopted as an alternative to real space exploration has already cost the lives of 14 astronauts, and will almost certainly
by joshuahedlund 15y ago
the multi-decade preparatory exercise adopted as an alternative to real space exploration has already cost the lives of 14 astronauts, and will almost certainly cost more as it drags on...
Seriously? Does anyone have more information on this? I like Reason but sometimes they can be a little biased. If there's no missing context and we're literally killing astronauts in safety training then there is no excuse not to just get them in space already.
- sehugg 15y agoZubrin is talking about the deaths in Apollo I, Space Shuttle, etc (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_spaceflight-related_accidents_and_incidents http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_spaceflight-related_acc...). His point is exactly that, get them into space already. Or rather, give them a mission that is worth risking their life.
- jessriedel 15y ago(We posted at the same time.) No, he's just talking about Shuttle programs. He considers the Apollo programs to be real exploration.
- jessriedel 15y agoHe's referring to the entire space shuttle program as "the multi-decade preparatory exercise adopted as an alternative to real space exploration". There were 14 astronauts killed on the Challenger and the Columbia disasters, 7 from each.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]