3 ms·
I think he means it was 30x more than gpt-3.5 is today.
by sebzim4500 4y ago
I think he means it was 30x more than gpt-3.5 is today.
- stavros 4y agoYeah but that's also 30x times worse. ChatGPT is much worse-performing than davinci-003.
- avereveard 4y agoyeah, I used to be able to create valid units for WarStuff with original chatgpt, but now all the unit it creates are full of hallucinated traits and special rules that aren't in the source.
- stavros 4y agoIf you try davinci-003, it will definitely be able to do it.
- refulgentis 4y agoNo, something’s off, and I’m interested in finding out what
- stavros 4y agoI don't think so. Try to convince ChatGPT to reply with "perform action: email" whenever you send a message that looks like you want to send an email. It just refuses to do it consistently. It might work once or twice per conversation, but soon it'll be asking you for SMTP credentials. It's an 1.3B parameter model, we can't expect much from it. It's a wonder it's as good as it is.