5 ms·
I work at company that uses AI to automate about ⅓ of the job of trained licensed professionals. Looking at GPT4 those licensed professionals are now completely
by josho 4y ago
I work at company that uses AI to automate about ⅓ of the job of trained licensed professionals. Looking at GPT4 those licensed professionals are now completely irrelevant. It's going to take years to build the supporting software around gpt4 to completely eliminate those jobs, but today I am convinced that we are on the verge of massive unemployment. Today thousands of job types have just been made redundant.
What scares me is we are unprepared for the kind of change that a perpetual 20% unemployment rate is going to trigger.
- consumer451 4y agoI wonder if something like UBI will ever be implemented, or whatever the alternative is will happen.
- Phenomenit 4y agoMaybe AI will be the objective UBI governor.
- swalsh 4y agoWhat an efficient and well run dystopia.
- moffkalast 4y agoFuturama's suicide booths may turn out to be most cost effective.
- consumer451 4y ago$21.06 trillion (US GDP 2020) / 258,000,000 (US pop. over 18yrs old) = $81,628 per person. After taxes and the National AI fee, that leaves $35,324 per person. Thanks to our new Universal Solution Booth affiliate program you will automatically receive 5 years of an additional share for each adult customer that you sign up. Start today!
- SinParadise 4y agoFunny, I had just watched Plan 75 yesterday.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- josho 4y agoCurrent conservative influence will delay UBI adoption. We'll first have to experience years of massive unemployment with no signs of improvement before we'll see something like UBI be instituted. It's going to make for an interesting period.
- fidgewidge 4y agoWhat will delay UBI adoption is that governments can't afford the current welfare systems, many of which are unsustainable, let alone a much bigger one. France can't even raise the retirement age by like one year due to massive protests but they have to, as the current retirement age is unaffordable.
- Ericson2314 4y agoNo if we have fancy machines that can do all the work we are not very poor, we are very rich. We should lower the retirement wage, or (better) reduce the work-week, to spread the work around more evenly.
- josho 4y agoWe have more wealth in the world than ever before. The problem is that it's distributed through something like a power law curve where a tiny proportion keeps all the wealth. If we changed that wealth distribution to something closer to linear then we'd have plenty of wealth to fund welfare systems while the rich can continue with their lives of luxury.
- whiddershins 4y agoUBI is good within a libertarian framework. Actually, universal, unconditional. Everything other version is totalitarian dystopia.
- celeritascelery 4y agoThat seems like the only reasonable way to do it. Humans are terrible at predicting the future, and preemptively implementing UBI could be disastrous. What if you implement UBI and the AI future never arrives? Or doesn't arrive for 100's of years? You just made a massive mistake because people thought they were smart enough to "know" what AGI was going to look like and how it would impact society.
- throwayyy479087 4y agoUBI won't happen after the shitshow that was 2020. If there wasn't widespread looting and civil unrest, maybe. That was as close of a test of the idea as the US will ever get. Another country will have to try and have it be VERY successful for a second shot at it here.
- throwwwaway69 4y ago[flagged]
- swalsh 4y agoIn a world of UBI, and AI doing most of the work, how free are you? In every definition of the word. When we were all farmers, things were pretty equal, and power could be distributed evenly. In our industrialized world we lost a lot of freedom "effectively". In a world of UBI, and AI, you're completely at the whim of whoever owns the machines. The AI needs to be owned by everyone.
- yeetard 4y agoDoes freedom matter when there's nothing left to do?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- noizejoy 4y agoFreedom’s just another word for nothing left to lose.[0] [0] https://americansongwriter.com/me-and-bobbie-mcgee-by-kris-kristofferson/ https://americansongwriter.com/me-and-bobbie-mcgee-by-kris-k...
- noizejoy 4y ago> When we were all farmers, things were pretty equal, and power could be distributed evenly. Peasants[0] living under feudalism[1] might argue that the large scale loss of equality already happened in agricultural societies. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peasant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peasant [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feudalism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feudalism
- ls612 4y agoPeople will fight over resources. Some will lose. As the ancients said, vae victus.
- yeetard 4y agosince UBI does not mean "unlimited consumptions for everyone" but some people will definetly want to consume more than others, and assuming with rampant automation there will just be basically zero jobs available exclusively for humans I generally wonder what humans will do to get more money to consume more? It seems like were just moving to some new kind of feudalism which is kinda scary.
- spicyusername 4y agoSuffering will be implemented.
- cwkoss 4y agothe alternative looks like robocop slum skyscrapers to me
- wnkrshm 4y agoIt will be UBI to stave off the bread riots and then fiver-type gig economy for every profession out there.
- in3d 4y agoCan you share what field you’re talking about?
- josho 4y agoI’m thinking about underwriting. The people that assess the risk of granting a loan or insuring property. These are highly trained specialists. We won’t be able to take gpt4 and replace their job directly, but we’ll mix gpt with other risk models and be able to remove their responsibilities. The same will be true for many many white collar jobs.
- fidgewidge 4y agoThe ToS forbids that sort of use case.
- semicolon_storm 4y agoYour entire career hinging on the ToS of a single AI company is not a good position to be in. Not to mention, the ToS forbids it due to the experimental nature of the tool. In a few years, I doubt the restrictions will be as tight as they are now.
- throwaway743 4y agoYeah, with this model.
- 00F_ 4y agoa big problem with these AI developments is that they change things so much and so fundamentally that it makes us all like boomers trying to use the internet in 1990. no idea whats going on. stumbling and fumbling along. you say that it will take years to build the supporting software. yeah, if it were just humans doing it. its so refreshing to see all the people in this thread who are expressing their concern about the most extreme employment/economic shockwave of all time. it gets way too little attention. but the impact on employment will be the very least of our worries not too long from now. mostly because people are too stupid to either realize that something terrible is happening or do anything about it.
- bryananderson 4y agoI work at company that uses the Newcomen engine to automate about ⅓ of the job of trained artisan laborers. Looking at the Watt engine those artisan laborers are now completely irrelevant. It's going to take years to build the supporting machinery around the Watt engine to completely eliminate those jobs, but today I am convinced that we are on the verge of massive unemployment. Today thousands of job types have just been made redundant. What scares me is we are unprepared for the kind of change that a perpetual 20% unemployment rate is going to trigger. Every new technology since the Industrial Revolution kicked off has been claimed to herald the elimination of millions of jobs and the dawn of permanent unemployment--and often they have eliminated millions of jobs, yet the permanent unemployment never comes. People in the past have always struggled to imagine the new jobs that will be created, and maybe we aren't any better at it.