3 ms·
I’m going to trust Meta’s sample size of probably thousands over your sample size of “multiple”. I had six juniors join my team remotely and three are amazing,
by zeroonetwothree 4y ago
I’m going to trust Meta’s sample size of probably thousands over your sample size of “multiple”.
I had six juniors join my team remotely and three are amazing, two are ok (do useful work but need handholding), but one is pretty bad. However I don’t know how that compares to non-remote hires so it could be that it’s worse.
- november84 4y agoI totally get that, but it’s important to look who’s providing the information. I highly doubt the analysis was independent of bias. We know many companies want to push for back to office work and commercial landlords are bag-holding hard… Some food for thought.
- marcosdumay 4y agoThis is really not a matter of sample size. If you want a real assessment of the problem, you will need to think about sampling, be careful about what you test, have a good amount of respect for the factors you don't know. Nobody on this thread has done any of this, but one is a huge company messing with the lives of many people and claiming they know exactly what they are doing.