2 ms·
As long as Peter Thiel had nothing to gain by starting a bank run (which, by all logic, seems likely), then he cannot be blamed for talking about the bank's ris
by chii 4y ago
As long as Peter Thiel had nothing to gain by starting a bank run (which, by all logic, seems likely), then he cannot be blamed for talking about the bank's risk and position which ultimately caused a run.
- wstuartcl 4y agoA ton of capital at the ready to offer bridge loans at shark rates or for blood equity for companies panicking and impacted by the same act of gathering those funds out of SVB to crash it seems like motive -- only time will tell.