3 ms·
Going to the pool and posting online are 2 different things. I would be happy with a law forbidding to post public pictures of your underage kids, regardless o
by eloisant 4y ago
Going to the pool and posting online are 2 different things.
I would be happy with a law forbidding to post public pictures of your underage kids, regardless of skin exposure.
- sramam 4y agoPersonally, I agree with your view-point. However, the law you are proposing would prohibit a parent from posting an image of their child winning the spelling bee, in a full suit. I have no idea how to thread this needle, outside making my personal choices.
- nradov 4y agoI'm not sure where to draw the line in order to protect children, but a blanket ban on posting pictures of them would never survive a First Amendment challenge. US Supreme Court precedents have made it clear that any restrictions must be more narrowly targeted.
- lotsofpulp 4y agoThis reminds me of https://arresteddevelopment.fandom.com/wiki/Milford_School https://arresteddevelopment.fandom.com/wiki/Milford_School > Children should be neither seen nor heard. Surely, kids can be seen in movies, tv shows, news articles about kids competitions or events, etc?