Most of their AUM is actual security holdings by investors, and should be held 1:1. They can’t dip into that to cover losses elsewhere. The question is where t

Most of their AUM is actual security holdings by investors, and should be held 1:1. They can’t dip into that to cover losses elsewhere. The question is where they’re investing the float. Investments of float accounts for a big proportion of brokerage profits (along with payment for order flow): > 57% of Schwab’s revenues are from net interest. The firm could literally give away every other service; discount the mutual fund fees to zero, do away with commissions, etc etc, and they would still be profitable. > Schwab isn’t even the leader among discount brokerages in dependence on net interest. That would be E*TRADE, at about 67% of revenues. Interactive Brokers makes 49% and TD Ameritrade 51% in the segment. https://www.kalzumeus.com/2019/6/26/how-brokerages-make-money/ https://www.kalzumeus.com/2019/6/26/how-brokerages-make-mone... Stock trading commissions in USA for a while have basically been a scam and it’s only because Robinhood came along that that source of revenue is gone to $0. That might result in more risk-taking on the float side.