3 ms·
That all sounds like it costs money. This is a capitalist society: companies operating correctly should provide as little service as possible for as much money
by coldpie 4y ago
That all sounds like it costs money. This is a capitalist society: companies operating correctly should provide as little service as possible for as much money as possible. Nothing you suggest aligns with that goal:
-A hard limit? Why limit your income to $600 when your customers can accidentally rack up a $6000 bill? You can even be magnanimous and negotiate it down to a $2000 bill and everyone's happy.
-Why would we pay money in monitoring software, SMS & phone call fees to stop a 10,000% revenue increase?
-$5 to try to tell a customer not to give us more money? Are you crazy?
-People getting sick under capitalism are drags on the economy and should be derided and made as miserable as possible so it doesn't happen again.
> Just imagine the quality of life improvements if people felt safe using a cloud provider.
We're not here to make people feel safe. We're here to make incredibly rich people even richer. Get on board, man. You'll never operate a successful company with your approach, everyone else will beat you on price.
- asplake 4y agoJust give us the option to pay. Some might call it an insurance premium. (And yes my satire detector is triggered, though one can never be sure)
- midoridensha 4y agoThe problem is that, very likely, there are decision-makers at these companies that have exactly this reasoning about problems like this.
- marcosdumay 4y agoWell, a company would do that to get more customers and to fidelize them. But none of that is important on an oligopolized market.