3 ms·
Based on context, I assume "investors" should in fact read "depositors" in the article? It doesn't seem like the author is disputing the traditional order of r
by ahepp 4y ago
Based on context, I assume "investors" should in fact read "depositors" in the article?
It doesn't seem like the author is disputing the traditional order of repayment (depositors, bondholders, stockholders)