4 ms·
I see it as very different from FTX. In SVB there was no fraud and no criminal wrongdoing; there may be no moral wrongdoing either. SVB was a chartered bank, su
by ptero 4y ago
I see it as very different from FTX. In SVB there was no fraud and no criminal wrongdoing; there may be no moral wrongdoing either. SVB was a chartered bank, subject to all regulation and reserve balance rules that other banks follow. As far as we know they followed all regulation to a letter.
Two things got SVB down. First, a rapid change in interest rate got their assets repriced down. It did not need to be fatal, this happens to all banks when interest rates rise quickly.
Second, its customers did a ran and went to pull their money. If all depositors of the BoA or Chase pull money out, those banks will collapse, too. This is highly unlikely for the BoA -- if folks start saying that BoA will collapse most depositors would shrug it off; the diversity of its base will make a run highly unlikely.
But as SVB was a much smaller bank and had a lot of similar customers (startups advised by similar VCs) the ran was seen as plausible at which point it was over -- customers pulled enough money to kill the bank. This is the price we pay for the flexibility of the current banking system that allows people to get loans and free checking accounts. My 2c.
- Mistletoe 4y agoThere may be no moral wrongdoing but it seems quite dumb to be so heavily in securities that massively lose value when rates go up and rates are at historic lows, no? The only job for these execs was to know which way the wind is blowing and they showed themselves to be not much better than every other rabid fool that bought GME etc. thinking things would never change and bull runs and low rates would last forever.
- freejazz 4y agoTo be fair, it sounds like some shockingly negligent management on SVB's part. Obviously thats orders of magnitude off from the complete lack of management w/ SBF.