4 ms·
Yes, that's the one. Very hard to read quickly, and an odd choice for a use case that I'd think would require absolute clarity and rapid recognition.
by urbandw311er 4y ago
Yes, that's the one. Very hard to read quickly, and an odd choice for a use case that I'd think would require absolute clarity and rapid recognition.
- cityofdelusion 4y agoIf you know cursive, it usually reads fast and clear. I don't think it is widely taught anymore though, as it was mostly a footnote when I was in school many years ago. It is a strange choice for the article considering the rarity of cursive these days.
- rhacker 4y agoThe cursive throws me off and I am heavily distracted by it. teho (to each his own)
- Joker_vD 4y agoI'd argue, on the contrary, it's perfect for keywords: you recognized those mostly by shape anyway, so now they don't even look like actual names which is an upside for me.