4 ms·
Again you are fundamentally misunderstanding how this works. The key proves who you are. You don’t need 40 different ones. Just at least one.
by ikiris 4y ago
Again you are fundamentally misunderstanding how this works. The key proves who you are. You don’t need 40 different ones. Just at least one.
- smaudet 4y agoI am really not, you are not understanding my core point - you should NOT have a single identifying key.
- ikiris 4y agodirect quote from my previous reply "Have multiple of them for redundancy, trust them all at your central auth point and this isn't an issue."
- mbreese 4y agoBut that’s a problem in and of itself… you don’t want to have 40 different keys that all prove that the bearer is “you”. Instead of having one thing to a worry about losing, you now have to worry about 40? And any of them would authenticate as “you”?
- ikiris 4y agoSo don't have 40 different keys that prove they're you that you didn't password protect and keep track of? This straw man is close to sentience at this point.