> Ah I mean if you're hell bent on not being impressed by ChatGPT you don't have to be. This is such a disingenuous strawman. You've just responded to a long

> Ah I mean if you're hell bent on not being impressed by ChatGPT you don't have to be. This is such a disingenuous strawman. You've just responded to a long argument with a lazy faux dismissal based on personality and animosity. The criticism are well laid out and sourced. It's about the hype and lies around it, not the tech itself. I appreciate the tech and dislike the lies and misunderstandings. If you just dismiss me as "a hater" you're part of the lie. > Pundits and critics have a vested interest in predicting the future the way their readers want, but your time machine is as good as mine - it only goes 1 second per second and we'll get to the future at the same time. Except that's a lie. And when the insights of people who stop and think instead of just buying into claims unquestionably are proven right years down the line we hear the old "oh, hindsight is 20 20". That's not accurate. We can reflect on things when they happen. No need to wait. > If your role doesn't involve things ChatGPT would be useful for (eg you're a blue collar carpenter), it doesn't seem very useful, but neither do computers or the Internet, really. False dichotomy. If you think chatgpt is solving a problem by generating text, are you qualified to judge that text for accuracy, could you have produced that text yourself? Why is it that chatgpt beats you, typing speed? Thinking speed? What are the risks of overlooking things by virtue of allegedly being handed an answer. Wizards can be useful but also dangerous. The point is to reflect about it and not dismiss anyone who doesn't just hype it up. > Or do you want to at least be aware of incoming trends. Your whole argument seems aimed at some luddite strawman when in reality it's people who love tech, love new things, appreciate Chatgpt and others forms of ML, but see the BS flying around and want to stay intentional and have conversations grounded in reality. > Don't expect them to speak up about it either, they're too busy using it to write emails and make plans to be bothered to convince the haters. Another empty dismissal. People are using it so any related criticism is "haters". Implicitly your whole comment just wants to, instead of engage in the conversation, derail it and dismiss it. Reminder, when there's hype, everyone and their mother wants to "cash in on the hype". It doesn't matter if they need to sell you a bridge. Going into specific and reasoned arguments is more productive, specially in a place like HN that should foster discussion instead of squashing it like parent poster is doing.