Artificial intelligence will always be artificial. If science can neither have a better definition of intelligence, or analyze and understand the resulting bla

Artificial intelligence will always be artificial. If science can neither have a better definition of intelligence, or analyze and understand the resulting black box of a neural net, I don't see how AI would improve or get nearer general intelligence. I have much more curiosity about neurology and how psychology define intelligence, than how programmers are trying to build things that digest data. Proper science requires understanding. ML is not about understanding, it's only "sophisticated statistical methods". It is still artificial, thus but genuine.