4 ms·

I think on the surface I agree. Hate mobs doesn't sound great and death threats are simply illegal and should be prosecuted. If it is in fact all lies etc, the

I think on the surface I agree. Hate mobs doesn't sound great and death threats are simply illegal and should be prosecuted. If it is in fact all lies etc, then sure. But, I do think this is often exaggerated, and a lot of times "start a conversation about incredibly nuanced topics" might not be so nuanced and in fact hateful, look at dog whistles for example. That there is no tolerance for intolerance is kinda necessary (paradox of tolerance). Idk the case you are referring to so can't say if that's relevant to this situation or not. I do strongly disagree that people suck. My experience with people is that generally they mean well, try to live their best live, and wish well on others, even if they might disagree on some things. A good test is to just think about the people you interact with day to day in real life, not tv, not twitter, not whatever. That's reality.

shrimp_emoji 4y ago
At the end of the day, I don't think we can socially afford this kind of social engineering. The best we can, or should, do might just be "restrict actions but let people talk". Let people talk about killing minorities but make it illegal to act on it. Otherwise, you start imposing this whole fear-based command set of "you should never say certain things because I've decided in this moment that there's never a legitimate reason to ever say them and it might lead to action which we want to optimize out from even becoming a possibility because the Fourth Reich will rise irresistibly at any moment". It's a deeply depressing outlook to have about your fellow man, and that itself will drive bad outcomes. "You think making edgy jokes is not legitimate and that I'm about to slide down a slippery slope of fascism? Well, now maybe I will, or at least pretend to, if only to troll humorless Orwellian cunts like you." I.e., something like the https://psychology-spot.com/rebound-effect-in-psychology/ https://psychology-spot.com/rebound-effect-in-psychology/
- codeptualize 4y ago
  But I think nobody is arguing that all of it should be illegal, but there is a big difference between legality and whats socially acceptable. That's often conflated, and actually the point I have been trying to make; you can say a lot of wild stuff legally, but you can not expect others to just accept it, not react to it, and not change their opinion of you. There are also things that should be illegal, as example do you think death treats are fine? Or is that what you are referring to in my comment?
spoiler 4y ago
> I do strongly disagree that people suck. My experience with people is that generally they mean well, try to live their best live, and wish well on others, even if they might disagree on some things. A good test is to just think about the people you interact with day to day in real life, not tv, not twitter, not whatever. That's reality. I gave this some thought these days and I think you're right. I guess there are certain people who care about some issues at cost of everything else; not sure how I feel about that and how we help these peope be less antisocial sometimes. I guess at the end of the day even those people are at the very least trying to do good too. It's good to be reminded of that, so thank you

shrimp_emoji 4y ago

At the end of the day, I don't think we can socially afford this kind of social engineering. The best we can, or should, do might just be "restrict actions but let people talk". Let people talk about killing minorities but make it illegal to act on it. Otherwise, you start imposing this whole fear-based command set of "you should never say certain things because I've decided in this moment that there's never a legitimate reason to ever say them and it might lead to action which we want to optimize out from even becoming a possibility because the Fourth Reich will rise irresistibly at any moment". It's a deeply depressing outlook to have about your fellow man, and that itself will drive bad outcomes. "You think making edgy jokes is not legitimate and that I'm about to slide down a slippery slope of fascism? Well, now maybe I will, or at least pretend to, if only to troll humorless Orwellian cunts like you." I.e., something like the https://psychology-spot.com/rebound-effect-in-psychology/ https://psychology-spot.com/rebound-effect-in-psychology/

codeptualize 4y ago
But I think nobody is arguing that all of it should be illegal, but there is a big difference between legality and whats socially acceptable. That's often conflated, and actually the point I have been trying to make; you can say a lot of wild stuff legally, but you can not expect others to just accept it, not react to it, and not change their opinion of you. There are also things that should be illegal, as example do you think death treats are fine? Or is that what you are referring to in my comment?

spoiler 4y ago

> I do strongly disagree that people suck. My experience with people is that generally they mean well, try to live their best live, and wish well on others, even if they might disagree on some things. A good test is to just think about the people you interact with day to day in real life, not tv, not twitter, not whatever. That's reality. I gave this some thought these days and I think you're right. I guess there are certain people who care about some issues at cost of everything else; not sure how I feel about that and how we help these peope be less antisocial sometimes. I guess at the end of the day even those people are at the very least trying to do good too. It's good to be reminded of that, so thank you