2 ms·
Meaningless seems like an overstatement. My understanding is that the big five is generally better, and has e.g. better test-retest consistency, but Myers-Brig
by drdeca 4y ago
Meaningless seems like an overstatement.
My understanding is that the big five is generally better, and has e.g. better test-retest consistency, but Myers-Briggs still has e.g. some correlations with the Big Five, and so it must measure some actual information.
- disgruntledphd2 4y agoThe big 5 are also terrible though, they needed to invent new statistical methods to get it to replicate.