4 ms·
Why did you identify him as your black friend? Instead of your friend? The quote isn’t even about race.
by nonethewiser 4y ago
Why did you identify him as your black friend? Instead of your friend? The quote isn’t even about race.
- yieldcrv 4y agoI think its because its much more likely that the friend is a reluctant beneficiary of signaling, not part of the powers that be I don't have any opinion on whether it made it meaningful to add race there, that way
- hprotagonist 4y agohis point is that such signaling is annoying on its face (it’s smarmy and patronizing) and also annoying because it doesn’t benefit him: especially compared to, say, competitive job offers, recruitment efforts at HBCs, etc. Actions that aren’t primarily focused on “showing”, but are concerned more with “doing”.
- yieldcrv 4y agoHBCUs yes, agreed
- naasking 4y agoIf it meant breaking the status quo on more meaningful quality of life metrics, like being able to get better jobs or better mortgages, I'm not sure the answer is so obvious.
- nobodyandproud 4y agoIt doesn’t. The NY Times put a moratorium on anti-Asian aggression by Black Americans during the early days of COVID. Yet they made an exception for a White on Asian, but all that did was mask the actual problem in society. Growing up as an immigrant, the racism in non-White American circles is also very real but never spoken of.
- paulryanrogers 4y agoConsequences of punching down may be different than punching up. Even if the ideal is no one throwing punches.
- nobodyandproud 4y agoWould you care to elaborate on what you mean here?
- paulryanrogers 4y agoWhites are a majority. So aggression from them toward a minority like Asians would be "punching down". Immigrants are typically a minority, so if they were discriminating or being aggressive towards the majority then it'd be considered "punching up".
- nobodyandproud 4y agoSo what about black american on immigrant discrimination?
- paulryanrogers 4y agoRegular punching I suppose. Regardless all punching is bad. It's just that there is some nuance in how it's dealt with. Much like big kids punching much smaller kids (and vice versa) on the playground.
- nobodyandproud 4y agoThis reduces to making discrimination and prejudice acceptable for certain groups. A better analogy would be the smaller kid finding yet another, even smaller kid to beat down. Then avoiding any mention of the smaller bully, because they were being bullied by someone larger. Nothing positive or nuanced about this position.
- deleted 4y ago
- stephen_g 4y agoThe "status quo" is racial discrimination, which the person who said that is presumably subject to. The idea is that the word lists make people feel like they're helping, when those people aren't actually doing anything to fix actual problems and actually keep the system going.
- nobodyandproud 4y agoI see lists like https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/stanfordlanguage.pdf https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/stanfordlanguag... as ridiculous. Tarball? “abusive relationship”? “war room”? This is way beyond the obvious racial discrimination and micro agressions. What are my kids going to deal with when they get into Uni?