4 ms·
Are you claiming the LLMs follow Asimov's laws? I'd be interested to read more about that. In any case, it has so far been proved possible to make an LLM act a
by sleepychu 4y ago
Are you claiming the LLMs follow Asimov's laws? I'd be interested to read more about that.
In any case, it has so far been proved possible to make an LLM act against its directives, why should this be different?
- ragebol 4y agoNo, he doesn't: the Asimov robot series uses these rules as a story telling device and show that, while these rules look good at first glance, are simply impossible to to follow. This leads to interesting stories, that's what they're for. And I don't think anyone is seriously working to make LLMs to adhere to these three Laws of Robotics.
- a_bonobo 4y agoAsimov is also quite handwavy in how these laws are implemented within the robots, making them out to be written in stone. I haven't encountered an LLM with a premise that cannot be broken out of.
- euroderf 4y agoDon't forget the 4th Law ("A robot shall not have or use access to means of unlimited self-reproduction") and the 5th Law ("A robot shall be able to explain its decisions").
- dekhn 4y agoI don't think it would be difficult to make a chatgpt derived LLM that was able to explain its "reasoning" on how to apply the laws of robotics to any situation. Sort of like "Daneel meets the trolley problem", I guess. I never really thought much about the laws of robotics- they seem more or less impossible to achieve in a wholly consistent by any reasonable objective-seeking robot.
- qualudeheart 4y agoThe only laws are scaling laws.