5 ms·

Render.com is another spiritual successor of Heroku. I'd love a world where Fly and Render are both very successful companies.

te_chris 4y ago
Not gonna happen. Both will get acquired because that’s how things work now
- jamil7 4y ago
  Not sure why this is downvoted, it’s a valid point.
- jstummbillig 4y ago
  Unless a company is very explicit about this not being in the books, I tend to share this outlook. From the perspective of a recent founder, it's downright spooky to build around any SaaS, considering how few of them have been around for 10+ years, when that is certainly what our business is aiming for. I know (and share the feels): Devs tend to get excited about the new thing – but if Google Workspace shut down next month, we would be in so much operational trouble. When other peoples fancies stand in the way of the entire operation you are responsible for, it actually begs the question how much closed source SaaS you can allow before it starts to be quite frankly irresponsible. We are not imagining things. SaaS of all sizes shut down all the time, and when you are heavily relying on them and building software around them to run a business the prospect is spooky as hell.
  - zamnos 4y ago
    The difference between (free) Gmail and Google workspace is that workspace is a paid product. If you're big enough to warrant an AM, you can get terms which include continuity of business planning if Google does happen to shut down Workspace. (They won't.)
    - manmal 4y ago
      Is your argument that Workspace is a paid product and therefore won’t be shut down? If yes, let’s keep in mind that Stadia was paid-for too. My trust in the longevity of Google products has been damaged beyond repair.
      - giovannibonetti 4y ago
        The difference is that Stadia was definitely losing money, whereas Google Workspace might be profitable.
- sethammons 4y ago
  I'm guessing that downvotes come from those who see the macro environment changing. With increased rates, borrowing to purchase companies may make less sense.
  - te_chris 4y ago
    Macro makes it harder to raise funding too though - VC no longer as attractive given the risks and higher interest rates available
- morelisp 4y ago
  These threads from mrkurt a few months ago seem relevant here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32955520 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32955520 If they are a multiplier for a whole portfolio, there's not much reason for any particular branch to purchase them. (This post seems like some evidence they might actually be building the wrong thing, though.)
- anurag 4y ago
  (Render founder) I'd love to understand why you think this is the only outcome. Render has positive gross margin and a clear path to profitability based on both our growth so far and the tailwinds in this space. I'm also aware of other companies like ours that have grown all the way to IPO or are well on their way. I'm very explicit both internally and externally that an acquisition is a failure mode for Render. We're building this for the very long term and plan to keep it that way.
  - te_chris 4y ago
    I guess I’m just default cynical these days seeing how much money’s still floating around and the scale of the cloud big 3. Apologies, it wasn’t personal. I admire your vision and hope it can work, money always seems to talk eventually though. We need more companies that have the nerve to hold on and develop on their own.
  - metadat 4y ago
    I admire your sentiment, at the same time founding teams don't typically say no to US$XX,XXX,XXX,XXX acquisition offers that'd cash you out for at least a few billion to you personally. Are there any examples where the capitalism bottom line is ignored and a company keeps growing with extremely premium generous acquisition offers on the table? I can't think of any, but there could be a few. However, I expect it's pretty rare. For companies with such tremendous growth, the venture capitalist firms are primarily looking to make their <big-multiplier> return and push priorities accordingly (understandably). The only constant in life is change, it's best to focus on what you can do right now, today, and only put out promises or commitments that you have the necessary influence to follow through on. Some things are bigger than each of us. Best wishes and godspeed to you and fly.io!
  - Aeolun 4y ago
    > I'd love to understand why you think this is the only outcome. I’m curious why you think it isn’t? On a long enough timescale all good things seem to be acquired by large megacorps for a fuckton of money. Slack, Linode, Minecraft, the list goes on. Eventually they all make the thing less than it was before under the founders’ vision. At least from my perspective. It won’t stop me from cheering them on, but I’m still very skeptical of them not being bought out in 10 years.
vorticalbox 4y ago
Render has some great features like making a new sub domain for when a PR is opened so you can test it as a fully working API before you merge
- alexgrover 4y ago
  That’s supported on most PAAS these days, including Heroku.
  - vorticalbox 4y ago
    On their free tiers though?
    - deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
    - alexgrover 4y ago
      Well, no longer free on Heroku, but it was
      - vorticalbox 4y ago
        did not know heroku had that.
- bfdes 4y ago
  I believe Netlify introduced this feature. It is now ubiquitous (as alexgrover said).
rychco 4y ago
Yeah I like them both a lot, having tried deploying small projects on each. However, I’ve defaulted to render at the moment because I’ve found it painless for my current project, and edge compute is low on my list of priorities. Though to be fair, even if render collapsed overnight, I think I’d still be equally satisfied after moving to fly.
aitchnyu 4y ago
I'm waiting for a site that does comparison matrixes. It should have checkboxes for autoscaled compute, easy build/push, scheduled/queued tasks, WAF and CDN, object storage (wish Render had this specifically), emails, easy addons to other SaaS.

te_chris 4y ago

Not gonna happen. Both will get acquired because that’s how things work now

jamil7 4y ago
Not sure why this is downvoted, it’s a valid point.
jstummbillig 4y ago
Unless a company is very explicit about this not being in the books, I tend to share this outlook. From the perspective of a recent founder, it's downright spooky to build around any SaaS, considering how few of them have been around for 10+ years, when that is certainly what our business is aiming for. I know (and share the feels): Devs tend to get excited about the new thing – but if Google Workspace shut down next month, we would be in so much operational trouble. When other peoples fancies stand in the way of the entire operation you are responsible for, it actually begs the question how much closed source SaaS you can allow before it starts to be quite frankly irresponsible. We are not imagining things. SaaS of all sizes shut down all the time, and when you are heavily relying on them and building software around them to run a business the prospect is spooky as hell.
- zamnos 4y ago
  The difference between (free) Gmail and Google workspace is that workspace is a paid product. If you're big enough to warrant an AM, you can get terms which include continuity of business planning if Google does happen to shut down Workspace. (They won't.)
  - manmal 4y ago
    Is your argument that Workspace is a paid product and therefore won’t be shut down? If yes, let’s keep in mind that Stadia was paid-for too. My trust in the longevity of Google products has been damaged beyond repair.
    - giovannibonetti 4y ago
      The difference is that Stadia was definitely losing money, whereas Google Workspace might be profitable.
sethammons 4y ago
I'm guessing that downvotes come from those who see the macro environment changing. With increased rates, borrowing to purchase companies may make less sense.
- te_chris 4y ago
  Macro makes it harder to raise funding too though - VC no longer as attractive given the risks and higher interest rates available
morelisp 4y ago
These threads from mrkurt a few months ago seem relevant here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32955520 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32955520 If they are a multiplier for a whole portfolio, there's not much reason for any particular branch to purchase them. (This post seems like some evidence they might actually be building the wrong thing, though.)
anurag 4y ago
(Render founder) I'd love to understand why you think this is the only outcome. Render has positive gross margin and a clear path to profitability based on both our growth so far and the tailwinds in this space. I'm also aware of other companies like ours that have grown all the way to IPO or are well on their way. I'm very explicit both internally and externally that an acquisition is a failure mode for Render. We're building this for the very long term and plan to keep it that way.
- te_chris 4y ago
  I guess I’m just default cynical these days seeing how much money’s still floating around and the scale of the cloud big 3. Apologies, it wasn’t personal. I admire your vision and hope it can work, money always seems to talk eventually though. We need more companies that have the nerve to hold on and develop on their own.
- metadat 4y ago
  I admire your sentiment, at the same time founding teams don't typically say no to US$XX,XXX,XXX,XXX acquisition offers that'd cash you out for at least a few billion to you personally. Are there any examples where the capitalism bottom line is ignored and a company keeps growing with extremely premium generous acquisition offers on the table? I can't think of any, but there could be a few. However, I expect it's pretty rare. For companies with such tremendous growth, the venture capitalist firms are primarily looking to make their <big-multiplier> return and push priorities accordingly (understandably). The only constant in life is change, it's best to focus on what you can do right now, today, and only put out promises or commitments that you have the necessary influence to follow through on. Some things are bigger than each of us. Best wishes and godspeed to you and fly.io!
- Aeolun 4y ago
  > I'd love to understand why you think this is the only outcome. I’m curious why you think it isn’t? On a long enough timescale all good things seem to be acquired by large megacorps for a fuckton of money. Slack, Linode, Minecraft, the list goes on. Eventually they all make the thing less than it was before under the founders’ vision. At least from my perspective. It won’t stop me from cheering them on, but I’m still very skeptical of them not being bought out in 10 years.

vorticalbox 4y ago

Render has some great features like making a new sub domain for when a PR is opened so you can test it as a fully working API before you merge

alexgrover 4y ago
That’s supported on most PAAS these days, including Heroku.
- vorticalbox 4y ago
  On their free tiers though?
  - deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
  - alexgrover 4y ago
    Well, no longer free on Heroku, but it was
    - vorticalbox 4y ago
      did not know heroku had that.
bfdes 4y ago
I believe Netlify introduced this feature. It is now ubiquitous (as alexgrover said).

rychco 4y ago

Yeah I like them both a lot, having tried deploying small projects on each. However, I’ve defaulted to render at the moment because I’ve found it painless for my current project, and edge compute is low on my list of priorities. Though to be fair, even if render collapsed overnight, I think I’d still be equally satisfied after moving to fly.

aitchnyu 4y ago

I'm waiting for a site that does comparison matrixes. It should have checkboxes for autoscaled compute, easy build/push, scheduled/queued tasks, WAF and CDN, object storage (wish Render had this specifically), emails, easy addons to other SaaS.