3 ms·
Science may not be "rooted" in this, but it is nonetheless still a pretty good bet that a scientific expert knows things that non-experts don't.
by lisper 4y ago
Science may not be "rooted" in this, but it is nonetheless still a pretty good bet that a scientific expert knows things that non-experts don't.
- marcosdumay 4y agoWell, if he works assuming he knows those things, he will fail in doing science. (Unless by those things you mean the scientific method, because scientists usually practice that one.)
- NegativeK 4y agoThat sounds like you're claiming that scientists must be ignorant in all things. That can't be productive. A scientist must be incredibly knowledgeable in some things so that they can advance the world's understanding in things that they're ignorant about. They also must be willing to uproot their assumptions, if the evidence points that way. But they still must be experts in their assumptions.