7 ms·

They say published, and link to a pre-print. It's not peer reviewed.

• isaacfrond 4y ago
  Not yet. The paper looks legit to me. Publishing first on a pre-print archive is pretty standard precise. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.11.18.517004v2.full.pdf https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.11.18.517004v2....
  • deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
  • stabbles 4y ago
    It's also a great way to spread misinformation if the paper has issues. This post goes viral, but news about it getting retracted won't. The article shouldn't refer to it as "published in December". It should say that the paper is not peer reviewed yet.
    • antegamisou 4y ago
      That's 'tech journalism' for you btw, especially when it comes from cesspool quality writers from the site at the OP.
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]