3 ms·
Not any worse than nyt, cnn, wsj… Get over your personal prejudice and evaluate the writing based on the quality of the article rather than your brand orientati
by simple-thoughts 4y ago
Not any worse than nyt, cnn, wsj… Get over your personal prejudice and evaluate the writing based on the quality of the article rather than your brand orientation.
Not that this article is particularly good.
- JumpCrisscross 4y agoI know reporters at the Times, Journal and Post. Their vetting processes are incomparable. That makes the writing at the Post (and News) more fun, because it lets itself be ridiculous. But stuff like fact checking sources, or requiring multiple sources for nontrivial claims, is a thing that’s sometimes sidestepped at one set and totally nonexistent at the other.
- simple-thoughts 4y agoI’d believe you if we hadn’t just gone through 2 years of covid disinformation spread by those organizations - whatever vetting process they are using clearly didn’t work.
- archagon 4y agoCan you be specific? What misinformation are you referring to?
- dekhn 4y agoBy any reasonable metric, NYT is far better than NY Post. The Post is a tabloid, the Times is a journal of record.