4 ms·
I don't dispute that there's a theory of change here: "if we explore the linguistic landscape, we can discover a set of signifiers that will help us to destroy
by scarmig 4y ago
I don't dispute that there's a theory of change here: "if we explore the linguistic landscape, we can discover a set of signifiers that will help us to destroy racism/sexism/etc."
I just reject that. We don't live in a Harry Potter book where the correct series of incantations affect the material world.
- roughly 4y agoThat's not the theory of change at play here. You're rejecting a straw man. As to the rest of it: "Officer, arrest that man" is a series of incantations that affect the material world.
- scarmig 4y agoI can say that right now, and nothing happens. The words aren't the causal elements here changing the world; it's the referants and power hierarchies that do. The proper analogy would be thinking that requiring saying "Officer, detain-in-an-official-capacity that man!" instead would somehow fix police violence.
- roughly 4y ago> I can say that right now, and nothing happens. The words aren't the causal elements here changing the world; it's the referants and power hierarchies that do. And you think this is something that’s not understood among those pushing for linguistics changes?
- jimbokun 4y agoI think that. I think those people distract and soothe themselves from their inability to enact change with linguistic games.