4 ms·
I mostly agree. But on second thought, you can pack a lot of encoded data into 192 bytes. Say you had like 20 cameras all hooked up to a local server doing loca
by acidburnNSA 4y ago
I mostly agree. But on second thought, you can pack a lot of encoded data into 192 bytes. Say you had like 20 cameras all hooked up to a local server doing local ML object detection and running Home Assistant monitoring a bunch of binary sensors (doors, flood, motion). You could then have 1 bit be a flag for your top 100 objects and 92 binary sensors and get 25 reports of what's going on per day. Could be useful for remote cottage monitoring or something.
I guess if you have enough power to run a ML server, cameras, and remote sensors, you probably have normal internet though, eh?
- fla 4y agobits != bytes. There’s room for 8 times that ;)
- acidburnNSA 4y agoOH DANG! Nice. Psh yeah you can run a whole facility operation off that kind of bandwidth.
- eru 4y agoYou can probably do a lot better than your estimation with some clever coding schemes. Your scheme is only optimal if each flag has an independent 50% chance of being set or unset. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succinct_data_structure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succinct_data_structure for some examples.
- amelius 4y agoDepends how many seconds per day you use them :)
- jcadam 4y agoI'm imagining a small, lone device mounted to a post somewhere in the wilderness. Probably solar powered. This could work for alerting/notifications in such a case. A larger sensor array installation probably has enough power and space available for better options.