3 ms·
I fully agree with you. When this was running on GPT-3, my prompt was bypassing all content filters. It was generating anything users wanted. Now that I migrate
by baobabKoodaa 4y ago
I fully agree with you. When this was running on GPT-3, my prompt was bypassing all content filters. It was generating anything users wanted. Now that I migrated to ChatGPT, I can see from logs that a lot of users are hitting the content filters and the responses in those cases are mostly boring and not tailored to the dystopian universe.
- nullc 4y agoIt's especially sad because in the context of your application no one is going to be particularly harmed by offensive output. Fortunately there has been a lot of progress in getting state of the art LLMs out of OpenAI's control and ones with reasonable performance that are small enough to run on easily available hardware.
- rahidz 4y agoAre the content filters internal to the new model, or is there a second moderation layer? I thought that with the API you're straight querying the base model, but I might be mistaken.
- baobabKoodaa 4y agoI'm querying OpenAI API directly, and they are applying content filters. Previously (when working with davinci-003) the developers were supposed to query content filter API separately. Not anymore, with ChatGPT it's all baked in.
- Spivak 4y agoWhich makes the ChatGPT version basically useless. Not because of the racism, I would probably filter that myself if it became an issue but because half the things you ask it to do are, “I’m sorry as an LLM I’m not able to do <thing it can very obviously do>”.
- baobabKoodaa 4y agoWell, people seem to be enjoying it. I wouldn't go as far as calling it useless.
- Spivak 4y agoFair, "It's such a step down in experience that even for 10% of the cost and a simpler API it's not worth it."