> going from 400ms to 100ms gets you...nothing. According to Amazon [0] that'd be a 3% gain in sales (assuming the inverse holds true as getting slower, anyway

> going from 400ms to 100ms gets you...nothing. According to Amazon [0] that'd be a 3% gain in sales (assuming the inverse holds true as getting slower, anyway). [0] https://www.gigaspaces.com/blog/amazon-found-every-100ms-of-latency-cost-them-1-in-sales https://www.gigaspaces.com/blog/amazon-found-every-100ms-of-...