3 ms·
At a prior job we pinned to 4.2.3 because after that version an internal change massively impacted high frame rates. With a 1080p mp4 file on disk, and that dis
by bsenftner 4y ago
At a prior job we pinned to 4.2.3 because after that version an internal change massively impacted high frame rates. With a 1080p mp4 file on disk, and that disc being an ssd, version 4.2.3 delivers 700-800 frames per second, while all the versions after that 4.2.3 release - no other app or library changes - that same file may reach 300 fps. I spent some time trying to find the cause of that 50% cut in efficiency, but never found enough time.
Curious to try this version.
- esperent 4y ago> I spent some time trying to find the cause of that 50% cut in efficiency Presumably they have an issue tracker. Did you report this?
- bsenftner 4y agoWhen I looked, it had been reported already.
- cstejerean 4y agodo you have a link?
- mixmastamyk 4y agoYou are referring to (re)encoding a file?
- bsenftner 4y agoJust playback.
- mixmastamyk 4y agoWhy would you play back at 10x?
- bsenftner 4y agoWhen training an algorithm using video, seek the minimal overhead because you're going to be decompressing several billion frames.