3 ms·
? well assuming poverty is the issue. solve the poverty. for all people. i dont see why it makes sense to focus on a just so happens to be related group. or i
by benj111 4y ago
?
well assuming poverty is the issue. solve the poverty. for all people. i dont see why it makes sense to focus on a just so happens to be related group.
or is black poverty acceptable because it was forced on them by the white man? whereas all poor white people deserve it?
- freejazz 4y agoI'm just pointing out that it's incredibly magnanimous for you to ponder the thought that maybe black people don't have to be poor. Like I said, incredibly magnanimous.
- benj111 4y agoWhere did I say they have to be poor, or should be poor? If you read the thread, I'm the one who isn't implicitly conflating the 2, which I suspect is at least part of the disconnect. This is why I don't get arguments mentioning slavery etc. Because poverty and blackness are separate. You don't need a racial component to go about fixing that. So the snark is wrong.
- freejazz 4y ago>Where did I say they have to be poor, or should be poor? I didn't say or suggest you said that.