4 ms·
Banning the speech doesn't prevent the violence. Frankly I'd prefer the verbal warning to the surprise attack. I also don't like the idea of receiving multi-pa
by MrLeap 4y ago
Banning the speech doesn't prevent the violence. Frankly I'd prefer the verbal warning to the surprise attack.
I also don't like the idea of receiving multi-part prose shouted at me from the sidewalk on what someone is going to do with my entrails if they have no intention of actually trying to follow through.
I can't imagine a perfect rule regime, personally. Humans are slippery when it comes to being jerks.
- JKCalhoun 4y ago> Banning the speech doesn't prevent the violence. Speech is cheap. The scenario I am imagining is someone calling you and telling you they are going to kill you and your family. Thanks for the "verbal warning".
- jimbokun 4y agoIt could if action is taken against the person making the threat before they can carry it out.