The key issue I think is the lie that this system is intelligent in any way, it simply isn't. And if people approach it that way, that it's just statistically f

The key issue I think is the lie that this system is intelligent in any way, it simply isn't. And if people approach it that way, that it's just statistically fabricating word text patterns from massive input word text, it will remove the dangers mentioned and enable people to know that its not expressing thoughts as people do with words, but just outputting words that may or may not have any correspondence with the truth. That OpenAI and others claim it has intelligence, when it clearly does not, will make for interesting legal liabilities going forward if people experience any harm with the system and decide to take legal action. (Also true for autonomous driving which uses the same ml/dl tech) Ml/dl can be very helpful and factual as artificial perception when the input is directly from space-time and give factual measurements as input to conceptual awareness, but perception alone does not intelligence make.