>the habitual absence of experimental evidence. You can run economic experiments. That isn't the problem. The bigger problem is the unstated assumption of a pe

>the habitual absence of experimental evidence. You can run economic experiments. That isn't the problem. The bigger problem is the unstated assumption of a perfectly liquid economy even in the absence of money and the fact that the mathematical models are supposed to drive reality and not the other way around. Homo sapiens is supposed to mimic homo economics.