3 ms·

> If you're in an industry that is likely to have random drug tests, it may be wise to change organizations/industry FTFY

anaganisk 4y ago
I dont want a high pilot on my flight. But it becomes a problem when the pilot, who is a good aviator, is addicted to something due to depression. The tests are the only way it can be caught. If the pilot was ethical/morally competent, he wouldn't have taken anything before a flight at least longtime before it. It's wise to change, yes, but how many people in denial will do that.
- Scoundreller 4y ago
  > I dont want a high pilot on my flight. They're usually not testing for intoxication, but any use at all (where possible). What's the point? Who cares what someone did last week? Meanwhile, you can be 200% hungover and blow 0.00 for alcohol even though it has totally affected you. > But it becomes a problem when the pilot, who is a good aviator, is addicted to something due to depression Sauce? Not ideal, but where's the problem with successful self-treatment of depression? > due to depression Any 2-brain-celled pilot would never admit to any psych issue whatsoever anyway.
maldev 4y ago
My field of tech is strict no drug. The level of job security and salaries this provides is insane. FAANG salaries, and a tenth of the work(if that) compared to private sector. Along with being near impossible to get fired or laid off and all I have to do is not smoke a doobie.
- agentwiggles 4y ago
  I can pass drug tests (without cheating, I mean), what's this magical tech field you're referring to?
  - maldev 4y ago
    Defense contractors.
- lern_too_spel 4y ago
  The job listings I've seen show junior-level Bay Area FAANG compensation for senior-level roles, but I might be looking in the wrong places. Maybe it gets comparable with overtime and hazard pay, but the work environment goes from better to far worse with those add-ons.
  - deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
- Scoundreller 4y ago
  well, I guess you have a point: non-evidence based requirements leads to non-evidence based remuneration/TC.
  - maldev 4y ago
    Welcome to government, where comp isn't based on skills and is based on years of experience. And money is based on hours billed rather than shipping a product like private sector :)

anaganisk 4y ago

I dont want a high pilot on my flight. But it becomes a problem when the pilot, who is a good aviator, is addicted to something due to depression. The tests are the only way it can be caught. If the pilot was ethical/morally competent, he wouldn't have taken anything before a flight at least longtime before it. It's wise to change, yes, but how many people in denial will do that.

Scoundreller 4y ago
> I dont want a high pilot on my flight. They're usually not testing for intoxication, but any use at all (where possible). What's the point? Who cares what someone did last week? Meanwhile, you can be 200% hungover and blow 0.00 for alcohol even though it has totally affected you. > But it becomes a problem when the pilot, who is a good aviator, is addicted to something due to depression Sauce? Not ideal, but where's the problem with successful self-treatment of depression? > due to depression Any 2-brain-celled pilot would never admit to any psych issue whatsoever anyway.

maldev 4y ago

My field of tech is strict no drug. The level of job security and salaries this provides is insane. FAANG salaries, and a tenth of the work(if that) compared to private sector. Along with being near impossible to get fired or laid off and all I have to do is not smoke a doobie.

agentwiggles 4y ago
I can pass drug tests (without cheating, I mean), what's this magical tech field you're referring to?
- maldev 4y ago
  Defense contractors.
lern_too_spel 4y ago
The job listings I've seen show junior-level Bay Area FAANG compensation for senior-level roles, but I might be looking in the wrong places. Maybe it gets comparable with overtime and hazard pay, but the work environment goes from better to far worse with those add-ons.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
Scoundreller 4y ago
well, I guess you have a point: non-evidence based requirements leads to non-evidence based remuneration/TC.
- maldev 4y ago
  Welcome to government, where comp isn't based on skills and is based on years of experience. And money is based on hours billed rather than shipping a product like private sector :)