3 ms·
Looks cool. Wher did you get the robot? Is it possible to buy the hardware?
by MichaelRazum 4y ago
Looks cool. Wher did you get the robot? Is it possible to buy the hardware?
- polygamous_bat 4y agoIt's a hello robot Stretch [1], which costs ~$20K. [1] https://hello-robot.com/product https://hello-robot.com/product
- MichaelRazum 4y agoVery cool! Thanks a lot.
- TaylorAlexander 4y agoSoo cool to see those being used! I worked for Aaron at Google X Robotics a few years back. He left to start Hello Robot and I was just wondering how all that is going. Sounds better than the team at Google - that whole project was canceled recently.
- barelyauser 4y ago>>U.S. Patent No. 11,230,000 and other Patents Pending. Curious about the claims on that patent. Robotics is already hard enough, I'm sure it will become easier with people suing each other because "you copied my wheeled robot with an arm attached to it!".
- Bjartr 4y agoThe claims are reasonably specific actually[1] If your robot doesn't have these specific design choices, plus some others, it's not in violation. * Have a unibody base * Have an arm that is raised and lowered along a trapezoidal rail by a belt-driven linear actuator * Have a fisheye camera mounted on the center pole [1] https://patents.google.com/patent/US11230000B2/en?oq=11%2c230%2c000 https://patents.google.com/patent/US11230000B2/en?oq=11%2c23...
- amelius 4y agoAre these claims OR-ed or AND-ed? Anyway, a base that looks like a Roomba, with a pole and an arm attached to it doesn't strike me as novel.
- Bjartr 4y agoPatent claims are AND. IANAL, but my understanding is if what you built doesn't match the claims exactly, it's not infringing. So, in this case, using a non-belt-driven linear actuator, or using a square rail, or using a two piece base would all be ways of avoiding infringement.