4 ms·
I think this is a mistake. The correct approach would be to throw as much money at it as needed while the hype train is rolling to gain users and worry about mo
by Awelton 4y ago
I think this is a mistake. The correct approach would be to throw as much money at it as needed while the hype train is rolling to gain users and worry about monetization later. It's not like the market share gain won't pay for itself. They are worrying about controlling costs for a product that hasn't launched to limit the interaction of users they don't have yet. They have spent billions on a search engine that nobody uses, why not spend some money on something that actually has potential?
- smat 4y agoAccording to an article at Ars [0], longer sessions are more likely to output undesired responses from bing chat. So the limits might simply be a workaround to avoid articles about strange behaviour. [0] https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/02/microsoft-lobotomized-ai-powered-bing-chat-and-its-fans-arent-happy/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/02/micro...
- Szpadel 4y agothis could explain 5 messages per session, but what about 50 per day?
- justsomehnguy 4y agolimit bruteforcing through 5 messages per session, obviously
- bemmu 4y agoAre articles about strange behavior really a negative? They are prompting it with guidelines that specifically ask it to use smileys and be interesting. They must know that these articles actually get people curious to try it. I found myself installing the Edge browser to play with Bing after seeing them, and I’m probably not alone in that.
- solarkraft 4y agoMicrosoft is brilliant at killing their projects thrift through greed while they're becoming successful. The story of Windows RT (their chance of leading the ARM transition) is hilarious.