2 ms·
> its sus that Ohio would ask for or need federal assistance for what amounts to a very localized emergency solely affecting a single town in a single state. T
by Supermancho 4y ago
> its sus that Ohio would ask for or need federal assistance for what amounts to a very localized emergency solely affecting a single town in a single state.
This is dismissive. I don't believe it's a proper categorization, at the core.
Ecological disaster that results from a train that crossed state lines, directly affecting citizens, casually appears to be a federal matter. The state is not expected to have spending and resources to cope with this type of disaster. Scale is just one quality of concern. Intensity is another. Responsibility is another. etc.
https://www.fema.gov/pdf/about/fy08_fema_sp_bookmarked.pdf https://www.fema.gov/pdf/about/fy08_fema_sp_bookmarked.pdf
> Mission:
Reduce the loss of life and property and protect the Nation from all hazards, including
natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters, by leading and
supporting the Nation in a risk-based, comprehensive emergency management
system of preparedness, protection, response, recovery, and mitigation
- gamblor956 4y agoI guess I should have been more clear: I'm just mocking the justification DeWine used to turn down prior federal emergency funding. Yes, it's a federal matter. The leakage crosses state lines. But Ohio already has billions in federal money it can spend toward this disaster that it is simply choosing not to spend, for ideological reasons, and which it is attempting to use to lower local taxes.