The author made a mistake. They defined "best" incorrectly, as something that is polished or up to some specific technical standard. In terms of making things,

The author made a mistake. They defined "best" incorrectly, as something that is polished or up to some specific technical standard. In terms of making things, the best should be more in line with being able to express yourself fully, not in terms of some pre-defined metric such as views or approval from the close-minded. Thus, a random spontaneous post can be much better than a well-researched one if it fulfils that criterion.