2 ms·

It's not editorialising to clearly state what a thing is. You could editorialise and say "unjustfied" or "long overdue" or "uninteresting" but the FACT of the

• blowski 4y ago
  The guidelines say: > Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize. "Massive" is an assessment inserted by the submitter. I agree with the assessment, but I'd rather see that in a comment than the title. Alternatively, use the word "massive" in the title of a blog post, and submit that.
  • harry8 4y ago
    They could have used a synonym for massive, such as "very large" which means precisely the same thing The original title IS misleading. The price has gone up a lot, water is wet. Massive describes to the reader accurately what this is without saying anything about it being good or bad, clever or stupid, a sign of something else or anything at all non factual. The original title is misleading. Any title that does not include price increase that is large is also misleading. I think you are all simply imposing your feelings about the price hike on the factual title and then saying ooh, editorial, but that isn't there, it's in your own mind. But hey, maybe I'm wrong, maybe you can sub edit a title that describes the change in price somehow more accurately. Let's see that. No points for describing an increase as an update, that's really doublespeak and very poor unless you're Microsoft PR or something.