3 ms·
I thought the article was telling us that it's not inert? edit (can't delete): oh you're talking about eating 'sand'
by pazimzadeh 4y ago
I thought the article was telling us that it's not inert?
edit (can't delete): oh you're talking about eating 'sand'
- Dylan16807 4y agoThe article is telling us that nanoparticles are not inert. But that's much smaller than sand or silt.
- sbaiddn 4y agoNothing thats nano is inert. That being said even inert things can act as catalysts, and even if they don't act as catalysts, they can sterically interfere with reactions