3 ms·
This author proudly waves their PhD in artificial intelligence while simultaneously being unable to conceive of a single good outcome that comes from the develo
by throwaway675309 4y ago
This author proudly waves their PhD in artificial intelligence while simultaneously being unable to conceive of a single good outcome that comes from the development of artificial intelligence.
Stable diffusion could solve a gap in medical imaging data
https://venturebeat.com/ai/stable-diffusion-could-solve-a-gap-in-medical-imaging-data https://venturebeat.com/ai/stable-diffusion-could-solve-a-ga...
Just because you can't conceive of one doesn't mean they don't exist. It is truly astonishing to me how little academic credentials translate to fluid intelligence.
- m00x 4y agoHaving a PhD doesn't really mean anything other than having really specialized into one part of a field (you can have a PhD in earthworms). A lot of PhDs are awful at system-thinking. From Scopus, it doesn't look like he's published anything scientific since the 1990s. https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7402278483 https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7402278483 He has not had a very strong career, and his knowledge of AI is antiquated.
- lvass 4y agoWhat did you expect, someone that believes AI is bad would be publishing papers to advance it? He's not a hypocrite therefore he doesn't understand what he's talking about, is what you are implying. Where is the evidence that his knowledge is "antiquated"? What has changed since then and when did he show not knowing that?
- vouaobrasil 4y agoThe author acknowledges there might be some good outcomes of AI by saying that AI is net harmful. That means there could be some good to it, but that the bad will far outweight the good. I do not believe some increase in health is worth the damage that AI will cause.