2 ms·
Like I said, I don't mean that we should shut down ALL innovation. I still believe science is worthy when it is used PROPERLY. What I aim to do is spark discus
by vouaobrasil 4y ago
Like I said, I don't mean that we should shut down ALL innovation. I still believe science is worthy when it is used PROPERLY.
What I aim to do is spark discussion so that we can think of some REASONABLE guidelines that prevent the developments of certain kinds of technology.
I used to believe that unbridled knowledge acquisition was good but over time I started to feel that some knowledge is better left alone. Whether that is really true is a difficult question but I believe that there is an optimal amount of everything, including knowledge.
Moreover, I feel that sometimes less is more. Having fewer possessions, eating less sugar, and yes, developing less technology, are all things that we should strive for.
Finally, there is more innovation than just technological. We could also innovate with our own minds, developing a deeper understanding of ourselves through personal development. Innovation does not have to be creating physical or technological products; we only focus on that because we are hypercapitalistic in our disposable society.
- throwaway675309 4y ago"Moreover, I feel that sometimes less is more. Having fewer possessions, eating less sugar, and yes, developing less technology, are all things that we should strive for." Yes, this is literally what the Amish did, they established an arbitrary period of time in which to halt all further innovation.
- vouaobrasil 4y agoThat is an interesting case study. Their limit probably is not ideal, but I think something similar with a different limit, would be good for us too.
- undershirt 4y agoIt might only appear arbitrary to us. The Amish actually periodically try out and evaluate new stuff. Then the elders decide whether it is a net good or bad for them. (Imagine if we did that with smart phones.)