3 ms·
> I mean, some folks in the thread were absolutely arguing in bad faith. A lot of people just go ahead with the "telemetry=bad" message + critique of telemetry
by the_gipsy 4y ago
> I mean, some folks in the thread were absolutely arguing in bad faith. A lot of people just go ahead with the "telemetry=bad" message + critique of telemetry in general without even taking a look at the actual proposal
It is still telemetry, other platform's toolchains dont have it, it's not bad faith for rejecting it.
> Anyway, it's open source, they're the maintainers, it's up to them, while if you want, you can fork it.
Yea, so Rust it is then.
- John23832 4y ago> Yea, so Rust it is then. As much as I like both Go and Rust, the jump between the two is not that easy.
- dustedcodes 4y ago> It is still telemetry, other platform's toolchains dont have it, it's not bad faith for rejecting it. .NET enters the room
- indrora 4y agoI've heard plenty of back and forth about adding telemetry to the Rust compiler because of hard to spot bugs. LLVM, GCC, etc. mostly depend on the crash reporter from distributions, and I know several Clang devs who have been thinking about adding some additional telemetry. No I won't mention names here because I do not want the innocent to be harassed because I posted on fucking hacker news.