6 ms·
> Though I do have an answer to "why"! It's because Apple claims they want to be in charge of payments to protect their users. Even if we ignore the "charge sli
by Dracophoenix 4y ago
> Though I do have an answer to "why"! It's because Apple claims they want to be in charge of payments to protect their users. Even if we ignore the "charge slightly more and make tons of money" plan.
There's a difference between being charging payments as a service and acting as a financial fiduciary on behalf millions of developers. I don't think you understand the legal gravity of the latter.
- Dylan16807 4y agoI'm merely suggesting they do the same thing they already do with payments, but skip the "downloadable in the app store" part. Since the app store is apparently nine tenths of their fee.