3 ms·

I believe the risks have not been discussed enough, which is why I am bringing it up. THe vast majority of the risk discussion barely scratches the surface.

• CatWChainsaw 4y ago
  Plenty of risk has been discussed. The problem is that it doesn't matter what the odds are of complete cataclysm; there's money to be made and "progress" won't be stopped. I wouldn't be surprised if chatbot muzzling is the only "regulation" we ever see.
• skybrian 4y ago
  Okay, but at this point, just bringing up the risks doesn't contribute anything. To make a contribution, you need to actually say something interesting about them, probably based on some experience or research. Or link to something that does.
  • vouaobrasil 4y ago
    I disagree -- disapproval is a strong thing. I think it even helps to stop having a universal "ooh, cool and shiny" attitude towards this garbage.
• khmii 4y ago
  I don't completely disagree with you that the risks have not been discussed enough but to me what is much more important is we have absolutely no structures in our society to deal with these risks. Not only do we not have the structures but we also have no ability to create them. If we did we would have already created them. Instead we are going to go with the tried and true method we always use: "What does this button do??" Then push the button and see what happens.
  • vouaobrasil 4y ago
    One of the structures we do have is to raise the issue and criticize it through discussion, which is why I often bring this up. A structure of intense and criticial discussion is directly counter to the capitalistic tendencies that have made this software possible. Since almost no one is offering a critical opinion, the people that do already provide some friction and realization against the indiscriminate use of this technology.