3 ms·
From that very link you can find info on the recent litigation accusing the government of an errant missile hit. There is enough evidence to bring forth the sui
by leetrout 4y ago
From that very link you can find info on the recent litigation accusing the government of an errant missile hit. There is enough evidence to bring forth the suit whether you agree it is a conspiracy or not.
https://lawstreetmedia.com/news/citing-new-evidence-surviving-family-members-sue-feds-raytheon-and-lockheed-martin-over-1996-twa-crash/ https://lawstreetmedia.com/news/citing-new-evidence-survivin...
- partiallypro 4y agoCivil suits are incredibly easy to push through (which is why there are various civil suits from assassinations and murders, even if the underlaying accused person/entity was found innocent), it doesn't mean it happened.
- pasquinelli 4y agoyeah, but false stuff also gets reported all the time, so how does one decide what to believe?
- WesolyKubeczek 4y agoYou in the US need a law that orders whoever loses a civil lawsuits pay all the expenses to the winning side.
- staticman2 4y agoWithout have an opinion on the topic I'll just point out it doesn't require evidence to file a lawsuit, only the ability to fill out paperwork.
- leetrout 4y agore: evidence, I'm just quoting what the article says: The wrongful death suit claims that Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) evidence has "emerged proving that TWA 800’s explosion was not caused by any defect in the airplane, but instead by an errant United States missile fired at aerial target drones flying nearby." I am curious to see how this turns out and how it is refuted.
- wpietri 4y agoOh, the people suing claim they have a reason to sue? How unusual.