> But even allowing for that challenge, and that the OSB has some genuinely good intentions, the proposed legislation is still remarkably poor. The part where

> But even allowing for that challenge, and that the OSB has some genuinely good intentions, the proposed legislation is still remarkably poor. The part where these articles always claim a horrific bill has some genuinely good intentions - it's truly obnoxiously weasely. No it does not have genuinely good intentions. It's a fraud wrapped inside a con wrapped inside a gigantic theft of human liberty and privacy. Just because someone feeds you sugar so that the poison they're giving you tastes better, it does not mean the intentions are good.