4 ms·
Hold on that could actually happen? It's not officially open source or anything?
by adverbly 4y ago
Hold on that could actually happen? It's not officially open source or anything?
- nickpeterson 4y agoPretty easy, just release new features as paid plugins that need subscriptions and make minimal updates to the core program.
- bombcar 4y agoJust make it part of Microsoft365 and don’t really bother updating the original. Done.
- seti0Cha 4y agoThe code is opensource, but not the ecosystem. Microsoft is maneuvering towards the same position as Android with respect to Google Play. Not technically mandatory, but so many conveniences are built on it that it may as well be for anyone not interested in investing a lot of time finding workarounds.
- ThaDood 4y agoI think it is, but there is also a fork call VSCodium without the telemetry, I guess people could just pivot to that? https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium
- horsawlarway 4y agoNo - it won't happen. The core editor is open source. At best, MS has some limitations around running some plugins (that they also develop) that require the licensed version of VSCode, rather than the OSS build. Most of those plugins either use MS servers (ex: Live Share) or use toolchains that MS is historically more closed with (their C++ toolchains). Generally speaking - you can use OSS Code today, without any issues. There's a flatpak here https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.visualstudio.code-oss https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.visualstudio.code-oss and many distros package it as the default... I run arch and it's in the repos as simply "code" - https://archlinux.org/packages/?name=code https://archlinux.org/packages/?name=code I run this as my default everywhere, and it works a-ok. There is a small subset of devs that would likely feel some pain losing the closed extensions, but the total impact feels overblown to me.