3 ms·
I'm not including social science, sorry, I should have pointed that out. I am including physics (excluding string theory), chemistry and biology; all quantitat
by dekhn 4y ago
I'm not including social science, sorry, I should have pointed that out. I am including physics (excluding string theory), chemistry and biology; all quantitative things with falsifiable experiments.
I agree entirely that social science news reporting is crap. I should have been much clearer about that.
- SV_BubbleTime 4y agoI think you highlighted it though. There is a spectrum of science. In the middle there are the hard verifiable objective things. And on the ends are subjective or unprovable theories. The goal is to increase that middle band over time. Science, scientific papers, scientists, universities have always been subject to weaponizing in the past. Tell me... Are eggs good for you or not?