3 ms·
Lying only requires the action of the deceit. Intent is not required. It doesn't matter if you intended to lie (as to whether it's in fact a lie or not); if you
by adventured 4y ago
Lying only requires the action of the deceit. Intent is not required. It doesn't matter if you intended to lie (as to whether it's in fact a lie or not); if you lied, it's still a lie regardless of your intentions. If there is understanding of the deceit (such that the lie is intentional) then that applies a higher level of moral culpability to the intent, however understanding is not required to lie (you'd never reach the end of: how much exactly is required to be understood for it to be a lie - omnipotence).
Things like intent and understanding are to assess responsibility.
- docdeek 4y agoI'm not sure I would agree. My three year old is learning to count. If I ask him what comes after the number 15 and he replies 17, I don't think he has lied to me. He made an error. He thought it was the correct answer but it wasn't. I know he said something that is not true, but without any intent to deceive me, is it a lie? Is he a liar? I don't think so - the intent matters.