5 ms·
Usually destroying 40% of a countries energy resource is considered an act of war but I guess if it's your ally that also spies on your top officials it's OK. /
by sschueller 4y ago
Usually destroying 40% of a countries energy resource is considered an act of war but I guess if it's your ally that also spies on your top officials it's OK. /s
- dang 4y agoPlease make your substantive points without snark or flamebait. This topic is obviously as inflammable as it gets. More at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34712496 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34712496
- sschueller 4y agoSorry, got emotional, can't seem to be able to delete it anymore. It's extremely infuriating situation having to deal with the consequences of what a few top officials decide the world should look like and expecting at least one side to play fair.
- wizzwizz4 4y agoYou can't delete once there's a reply. As a hack, some people edit the message to contain only the text "deleted": it's often poor practice, but since the only reply is from dang I think it'd be okay here.
- dang 4y agoNo need to delete. I know these things can be intensely infuriating—all of us have some topic that hits us like that. Managing that without bursting into flames is a work-in-progress and we're all learning together (myself definitely included).
- isoprophlex 4y agoOff topic but I really hope you wrote "obviously inflammable" there because this is a about gas pipes blowing up Pun intended or not, it's got me laughing
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- The_Colonel 4y agoI wouldn't be surprised if Germany OKayed it (IF USA did it). Germany returning to Nord Stream would be a disaster for everybody (including Germany). Paradoxically, removing Nord Stream from the consideration helped Germany and its political situation. I always thought it's more likely that somebody from the West did it, since from my perspective it helped West and not Russia. But what's confusing me is the rather muted reaction from Russia. If it wasn't them and if they believed it's the West, why are they so silent about it?
- isoprophlex 4y agoThis is an interesting take, a nice way to get out of the russian gas stranglehold without losing face to the right wing & anti nuclear electorates Gas pipes blowing up, massive disinformation campaigns, the utter hellhole that Ukraine is turning into... it's a scary, depressing time. On the whole I hope this helps us transition into renewables quicker, so that at least there will be a silver lining. (Conversely you might say this pushes us into burning more coal but I'd rather be an optimist)
- sschueller 4y agoEven if Germany OKayd it. 51% of it belongs the Swiss Holding company. You can't just go blow up some private companies assets and get away with it.
- The_Colonel 4y agoRussia does that every day on a mass scale and so far is getting away with it, unfortunately. If US is truly behind it, the Swiss company can sue US (and perhaps Germany) and I believe they would have a chance. Certainly better chance than Ukrainians have with reparations from Russia.
- chii 4y ago> Russia does that every day on a mass scale and so far is getting away with it, unfortunately. if they didn't have their nukes, then guess whether they'd "get away with it" or not.